Exposing the Soft Underbelly of the Beast

For those of us who believe the Federal Reserve, Wall Street and the major financial institutions in this country wield too much power, something recently happened that has me baffled. 

In March the US Securities and Exchange Commission requested a few of the regional banks to clarify their loan modification policies, what we call in the business "extend and pretend."  Last month the Financial Accounting Standards Board (better known as FASB) also got into the act by issuing new accounting guidelines for "troubled debt restructurings" (TDRs).

On the surface the new accounting guidelines for troubled assets seems quite reasonable.  FASB wants to standardize the definition of what constitutes a TDR so all financial institutions are operating under the same rules.  Right now that isn't happening.  In order to determine if the restructuring is a TDR, a lender must separately conclude that both the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the restructuring constitutes a concession.

Beginning June 15th lenders must re-examine their restructured debt to determine how much of it qualifies to be a TDR.  If so, the lender must classify it as such.  The end result is that for the very first time we will see how much of a lender's loan portfolio is deemed "troubled."  At the present time, lending institutions have been able to hide their TDRs with the hope that one day the market will turn around and the loans will be refinanced at market rates and terms, or better yet paid off in full. 

The new accounting rules could have enormous implications, most of which fall in the range between bad and catastrophic.  At the very least the number of loans classified as troubled debt will rise dramatically throughout the banking industry.  But the big question is, "Will the general public's confidence in a bank's solvency be adversely affected?"  Once the cat is out of the bag will the stronger financial institutions be reluctant to transact business with their weaker brothers?

Which leads me back to my original thought: Why did the SEC and the FASB do this?  If you believe like I do (most days) that the Federal Reserve, Wall Street and the major financial institutions wield way too much power, why would they allow these new TDR accounting guidelines to be implemented?  This is not in their best interests.  The change in these accounting rules has the potential of exposing the truth that they desperately want to keep hidden from the public - most banks are hopelessly insolvent.  This only helps to expose their true predicament.

The huge bank bailouts by both the Bush and Obama administrations, the extend and pretend lending policies of the banks, and the historically low interest rates by the Federal Reserve have all been implemented to directly benefit the financial institutions of this country.  So why are they now exposing the soft underbelly of the beast?  If you have an explanation, I'd like to hear it.

Sources: The Extend and Pretend Expose' - coming to a bank near you, ft.com/alphaville by Tracy Halloway, May 20, 2011; More Transparency Coming to Hidden Costs of 'Extend and Pretend' Strategies, CoStar Group by Mark Heschmeyer, May 18, 2011. 

Retail Is Coming Back Nicely

In my last post I showed the first quarter sales results by property type for our region.  Not surprisingly, 42% of all sales for the quarter were apartments.  What was surprising was the strong showing from retail: 29% of all sales in the first quarter.  So I thought this deserved additional investigating.

The CoStar Group recently had a webinar on the U.S. retail market.  The bottom line of their presentation - retail is coming back nicely.  Shown below are two charts that support their thinking:

As you can see from the chart retail has had 9 consecutive months of positive sales volume (people are buying more) and has been averaging about 6% annual growth since September of 2010. 

Absorption of retail space is also improving nationally as shown in the chart below:

After two negative quarters of negative absorption, we've now experienced 7 consecutive quarters of positive net absorption.  During this time period 80 million SF of retail space has been absorbed. 

Other interesting tidbits from the CoStar webinar were:

• Job creation, which spurs retail sales, has been positive for the past 5 consecutive quarters.
• Construction of new retail space has been almost nothing for 2010 and is projected to continue that way through 2011, which bodes well for further net absorption of retail space through the rest of this year.
• Sales of distressed retails sales is moderating.  Distressed retail sales peaked at 21% of all sales during the 2nd quarter of 2010.  During the first quarter of this year, distressed retail sales were estimated at 17% of all sales.
• Cap rates for retail properties have compressed significantly.  Retail cap rates peaked at 8.5% in the 2nd quarter of 2009 and are now averaging 6.5% nationally.

All of these statistics bode well for further improvement in the retail sector.  Let's hope this trend continues and that other property types can follow in the footsteps of apartments and now retail. 

1st Quarter 2011 Transaction Activity

The first quarter of 2011 is over.  From a sales standpoint how well did we do compared to previous years?  Shown below is the criteria we used to tabulate the results:

• Sales information from the CoStar Group database
• Transactions closed between January 1st and March 31st
• Investment transactions only (no owner occupied)
• Property types - apartments, office, flex, industrial, retail, mixed use & specialty use
• Transactions with sales prices of $1 million or larger
• Arms length transactions only
• Transactions located between Kelso, WA and Eugene, OR including Bend

Based on this criteria the chart shown below compares the sales activity for the 1st quarter for each of the last five years:

 
As you can see, the sale activity for the first quarter of 2011 increased significantly over 2010 but fell well below previous years.  The good news is that if this trend continues for the rest of this year, 2010 will have been the bottom of the market with a good possibility of improving sales activity going forward.   


We then analyzed the 45 sales transactions for the first quarter by property type.

As you can see apartments still are the most favored property type with 42 percent of the sales in the first quarter followed by retail.  Most of the retail sales were fast food franchises or single tenant buildings. 

Of the 45 sales transactions, only 35 identified the broker representation and only 38 identified the lending source used.  The remaining transactions did not provide sufficient information to determine the lender or if brokers were involved in the transactions.

Another way of looking at it, there were 45 paydays for all of the real estate brokers in the first quarter (17 x 2 = 34 + 7 +4 = 45).  So if you know how many of these transactions you were involved in, you can determine your market share. 

Shown below are the first quarter lending sources for the 38 sales transactions that a lender was identified.

Almost half of all sales transactions in the first quarter did not need new financing.  These results also explode the myth that life companies are back in the market.   After you take away the all cash buyers and assumed loans only 20 loans were placed in the first quarter, most of these from banks.  This paltry number of loans for the first quarter does not bode well for the mortgage brokerage community but hopefully we are on an improving trend.  I look forward to seeing how this quarter turns out.  Keep your fingers crossed.

What Impact Will Inflation Have on Commercial Real Estate?

After decades of little or no inflation there is mounting evidence that the Federal Reserve's Quantatitive Easing program is beginning to take its toll on the value of the dollar.  Shown below are some of these indicators:

• The Producer Price Index (PPI), which measures average changes in prices received by domestic producers for their output, is up 5.6% for the twelve months ending February 2011.
• Commodity prices are rising in relation to the dollar.  The price of gold hit an all time high earlier this week before settling down a bit.  Silver prices continue to soar hitting a 31 year high.  So far this year silver has gained 33% in value.
• A recent Deloitte Consulting poll indicated that 74% of those polled believe their spending will slow due to rising prices they are currently experiencing.

So what impact will inflation have on commercial real estate?  In the short-term the real question is what impact will the threat of inflation have on the Federal Reserve raising interest rates?  An increase in the federal funds rate would ease the concerns of those who fear inflation but it would likely have a detrimental impact on the fragile U.S. economy which is just beginning to show signs of recovery.  It's a delicate balance between these two policy positions.

In the long run, modest inflation would be a great benefit to commercial real estate, as long as it happens gradually so that the market can make the necessary adjustments along the way.  Real estate over the long run has been an excellent inflation hedge and it should be the same this time around too.  Over time, with modest inflation those commercial real estate investors who are currently upside down on their investment portfolio could gradually become whole again. 

My greatest fear is what happens in June when the Federal Reserve ends its own bond purchase program known as quantitative easing.  Who will fill the gap in buying U.S. Treasuries?  If no one steps in to the fill the void what will happen to interest rates?  Doesn't the law of supply and demand require that interest rates have to increase?  And more importantly how quickly will they rise and how dramatically?

Those are the questions that are currently being debated.  Surprisingly there is no clear consensus among the pundits.  We'll have to watch and see.  Stay tuned.  It's going to be fascinating to watch! 

Sources: PIMCO bets against U.S. government debt, Reuters, April 11, 2011; Don't Believe the Inflation Fear-Mongers, The Mark, April 12, 2011; Inflation Not a Threat? Most Consumers Aren't So Sure; CNBC.com, April 12, 2011; Gold Price Sinks After Hitting Ne High at $1,478, Gold Alert, April 11, 2011; Producer Price Indexes - February 2011, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 16, 2011.

The Six Immutable Laws of Real Estate Investing

James Montier, the well known author of "The Little Book of Behavioral Investing" recently wrote an article called "The Seven Immutable Laws of Investing."  In this article he identifies seven principles for sensible investing in the stock or bond markets.  I was intrigued by the title so I read the article and somewhere along the way I realized that 6 of these 7 "immutable laws of investing" also apply to investing in commercial real estate.  So I thought what the heck, maybe I should take a stab at writing an article on the "Six Immutable Laws of Real Estate Investing."  So here goes:

1. Always insist on a margin of safety.  In other words the goal is not to buy at fair market value but to purchase with a margin of safety as property performance, market conditions, etc. may not live up to expectations.  In our world of real estate this means finding properties that are under performing the market but with a change in ownership will turn the property's performance around. 
2. This time is never different.  The four most dangerous words in investing - "this time is different."  The dot.com bubble that occurred about ten years ago is a perfect example.  Investors were buying stock in companies that hadn't turned a profit on the expectation that they would be the next Google, or Amazon.com.  Stock prices soared and even though it made no logical sense the argument that was bandied about was, "this time is different."  The same was true of real estate.  How many believed that house prices could never go down?  In both examples a speculative fever resulted in a bubble causing stocks and house prices to plummet in value.  Whenever someone starts saying this time its different, get out of that investment as quickly as you can.
3. Be Patient and Wait for the Fat Pitch.  As Mr. Montier states in his article, "Patience is integral to any value-based approach on many levels... However patience is in rare supply."  In commercial real estate there is a time to wait and there is a time to act.  When things go bad, like they have for the last three years the tendency is to dump our real estate holdings as quickly as we can when the prudent thing to do is wait.  Most investors suffer from an "action bias" - a desire to do something.  But often times the best thing to do is to stand at the plate and wait for the fat pitch.     
4. Be Contrarian.  Humans are prone to the herd instinct.  When everyone is buying they buy; when everyone is selling they sell.  Last year the value of BP's stock plummeted due to the gulf oil crisis.  BP stockholders were dumping their stock and only a few contrarians were buying.  Less than a year later those that fought the urge to follow the herd have made a handsome profit while those who sold lost money.  Now's the time to be buying commercial real estate, especially those that have been hardest hit - office, retail and industrial.  Years from now we will realize that that there were bargains to be purchased in 2011.  Or we can go along with the herd and sit on the sidelines.
5. Be Leery of Leverage.  I really shouldn't have to say much of anything on this topic.  In many instances those owners with properties that were over leaveraged have paid the ultimate price - the loss of their properties.  Those homeowners who used their homes as ATM machines learned the hard way too.  Three years after the the collapse of the housing bubble about 1 in 4 homeowners have no equity in their homes.
6. Never Invest In Something You Don't Understand.  This is just plain old common sense.  It's not uncommon for for me to talk with real estate investors that are clueless about their real estate holdings which puts them at the mercy of their real estate advisors.  Many times these advisors have a different agenda than the owner but the owner not knowing the fundamentals of commercial real estate is unaware of the conflict of interest.  It's a simple truth: If you don't understand the investment concept, then you shouldn't be investing in it.

I personally believe that now is the time to be investing in commercial real estate as long as you follow these six fundamental principles.  Cap rates have risen significantly, the frothiness of the market has long since disappeared and  interest rates are low... at least for the time being.  Or you can be a part of the herd that sits on the sidelines waiting for a better day, a day that will likely never come.