Exposing the Soft Underbelly of the Beast

For those of us who believe the Federal Reserve, Wall Street and the major financial institutions in this country wield too much power, something recently happened that has me baffled. 

In March the US Securities and Exchange Commission requested a few of the regional banks to clarify their loan modification policies, what we call in the business "extend and pretend."  Last month the Financial Accounting Standards Board (better known as FASB) also got into the act by issuing new accounting guidelines for "troubled debt restructurings" (TDRs).

On the surface the new accounting guidelines for troubled assets seems quite reasonable.  FASB wants to standardize the definition of what constitutes a TDR so all financial institutions are operating under the same rules.  Right now that isn't happening.  In order to determine if the restructuring is a TDR, a lender must separately conclude that both the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the restructuring constitutes a concession.

Beginning June 15th lenders must re-examine their restructured debt to determine how much of it qualifies to be a TDR.  If so, the lender must classify it as such.  The end result is that for the very first time we will see how much of a lender's loan portfolio is deemed "troubled."  At the present time, lending institutions have been able to hide their TDRs with the hope that one day the market will turn around and the loans will be refinanced at market rates and terms, or better yet paid off in full. 

The new accounting rules could have enormous implications, most of which fall in the range between bad and catastrophic.  At the very least the number of loans classified as troubled debt will rise dramatically throughout the banking industry.  But the big question is, "Will the general public's confidence in a bank's solvency be adversely affected?"  Once the cat is out of the bag will the stronger financial institutions be reluctant to transact business with their weaker brothers?

Which leads me back to my original thought: Why did the SEC and the FASB do this?  If you believe like I do (most days) that the Federal Reserve, Wall Street and the major financial institutions wield way too much power, why would they allow these new TDR accounting guidelines to be implemented?  This is not in their best interests.  The change in these accounting rules has the potential of exposing the truth that they desperately want to keep hidden from the public - most banks are hopelessly insolvent.  This only helps to expose their true predicament.

The huge bank bailouts by both the Bush and Obama administrations, the extend and pretend lending policies of the banks, and the historically low interest rates by the Federal Reserve have all been implemented to directly benefit the financial institutions of this country.  So why are they now exposing the soft underbelly of the beast?  If you have an explanation, I'd like to hear it.

Sources: The Extend and Pretend Expose' - coming to a bank near you, ft.com/alphaville by Tracy Halloway, May 20, 2011; More Transparency Coming to Hidden Costs of 'Extend and Pretend' Strategies, CoStar Group by Mark Heschmeyer, May 18, 2011. 

Retail Is Coming Back Nicely

In my last post I showed the first quarter sales results by property type for our region.  Not surprisingly, 42% of all sales for the quarter were apartments.  What was surprising was the strong showing from retail: 29% of all sales in the first quarter.  So I thought this deserved additional investigating.

The CoStar Group recently had a webinar on the U.S. retail market.  The bottom line of their presentation - retail is coming back nicely.  Shown below are two charts that support their thinking:

As you can see from the chart retail has had 9 consecutive months of positive sales volume (people are buying more) and has been averaging about 6% annual growth since September of 2010. 

Absorption of retail space is also improving nationally as shown in the chart below:

After two negative quarters of negative absorption, we've now experienced 7 consecutive quarters of positive net absorption.  During this time period 80 million SF of retail space has been absorbed. 

Other interesting tidbits from the CoStar webinar were:

• Job creation, which spurs retail sales, has been positive for the past 5 consecutive quarters.
• Construction of new retail space has been almost nothing for 2010 and is projected to continue that way through 2011, which bodes well for further net absorption of retail space through the rest of this year.
• Sales of distressed retails sales is moderating.  Distressed retail sales peaked at 21% of all sales during the 2nd quarter of 2010.  During the first quarter of this year, distressed retail sales were estimated at 17% of all sales.
• Cap rates for retail properties have compressed significantly.  Retail cap rates peaked at 8.5% in the 2nd quarter of 2009 and are now averaging 6.5% nationally.

All of these statistics bode well for further improvement in the retail sector.  Let's hope this trend continues and that other property types can follow in the footsteps of apartments and now retail.